actor os car

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 17 June 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1980: Anthony Hopkins in The Elephant Man

Posted on 16:52 by pollard
Anthony Hopkins did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Frederick Treves in The Elephant Man.

Anthony Hopkins plays a relatively simple role here as Frederick Treves the good doctor who tries to help "The Elephant Man" John Merrick (John Hurt) by giving him a play to stay where he will not be abused. Hopkins who is best known for the very much evil doctor in The Silence of the Lambs in this film though plays a doctor whose intentions are only that of a good man. The role of the good man trying to be good should not be something scoffed off as it can be a challenge to not let the character be dull in just being good as well as finding the complexity in a man whose morality is not filled with compromises.

Treves technically speaking does have to become the purely good doctor which is his arc in the film. It is not there is anything wrong with him, but rather he has a fairly fast realization that Merrick should be treated just like any other man without exception. Hopkins though is very good though in this rather short journey that starts out as Treves first happens upon Merrick who he technically uses for his own purposes as an academic. Hopkins is good though by positing how the sympathy works in Treves. Hopkins very much sells the emotional power of seeing a man like Merrick and how it affects Treves.

Hopkins early on though portrays the sympathy that Treves has as very much real but perhaps not fully thought out in terms of what sort of sympathy he has. It is not the sympathy of one many plight but almost for the plight of an animal instead. Hopkins importantly does not make this as something Treves is doing for any malice, but simply he portrays it as having not had the point of realization that Merrick is a man and should be treated as such. Treves quickly finds that Merrick should not be treated in such a way and Hopkins's performance does very much show a truly good man in Treves.

Hopkins is excellent in being a truly good man in Treves and there is a great deal of power in his reactions to Merrick throughout the film. When Merrick finally speaks John Hurt is very emotional as Merrick even in a modest fashion, Hopkins is left to react to what Merrick is experiencing as well as find how Treves feels about his whole relationship with Merrick. Hopkins is very good though in being the face of a man who genuinely cares about Merrick. It is a powerful empathy that Hopkins conveys and he only succeeds in adding emotional weight to the scenes as well as helps amplifies the power of Hurt's performance.

Hopkins does not just support Hurt though as he is lead as as well because the full extent of his Merrick on his life is reflected in his own personal scenes. Treves expresses sorrow for having used Merrick himself in his own way comparing himself to the freak show host. The idea that the already good Treves would accuse himself as being a terrible man himself is made entirely believable and more important understandable through Hopkins's performance. He shows the shame Treves feels in honest fashion and shows his personal struggle to deal with Merrick the right way in an unassuming yet poignant fashion.

Anthony Hopkins performance as doctor Treves is an excellent example of an actor making the most of what could easily be a fairly simplistic character. Hopkins does this by firstly finding what is great in the simplicity and always showing the goodness of his character in an earnest way that succeeds in bringing a warmth and tenderness to the film. He as well though takes the complexities that are in the role uses them to make an in depth view of this man. Treves could have easily been a completely bland or forgettable character but Hopkins makes him an essential facet to this film.
Read More
Posted in 1980 Alternate Best Actor, Anthony Hopkins | No comments

Sunday, 16 June 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1980: Tatsuya Nakadai in Kagemusha

Posted on 21:22 by pollard
Tatsuya Nakadai did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Takeda Shingen as well as the titular character in Kagemusha.

Kagemusha is an excellent film about a time in Japan in which various clans lead by war lords try to gain power.

This is the first Akira Kurosawa film that I am reviewing a performance from that does not feature Toshiro Mifune. Toshiro Mifune and Kurosawa unfortunately had a falling out in 1965 and their last collaboration was Red Beard. Although one does have to look at the later Kurosawa filmography and can see that not too many of the films would have really been a fit for Mifune except his two films in the 80's Kagemusha and Ran, although then again maybe Kurosawa would have made films with Mifune in mind if he was still with Mifune but that's another discussion I suppose. Ran and Kagemusha though definitely did have a lead part there ripe for Mifune that was instead taken by Tatsuya Nakadai who could have been seen a successor of sorts for Mifune as he the sorta secondary leading role in High and Low when Mifune had the primary lead.

I guess the first thing that needs to be said is that Nakadai is not Toshiro Mifune. He doesn't have that same type of overwhelming presence that Mifune had. That is not a problem when it comes to this role and Nakadai does still have a strong although not quite as individualistic screen presence. Nakadai is suppose to be both Shingen and his double and look rather very closely to his brother Nobukado (Tsutomu Yamazaki). Both Nakadai and Yamazaki look almost nothing like the way they looked in High and Low. This can of course can be attributed to makeup, the 16th century costumes, and that this film was made seventeen years later, but as well because they don't quite have that distinction Mifune had in his face. You can always see Mifune no matter the costume, the facial hair, or even his age as his piercing eyes alone are a dead give away. Nakadai was probably actually the better choice simply because it is easier to believe there could be more than one Nakadai where two Mifunes might have been a bit of a stretch.

Anyway I ought to forget Mifune as he was never going to play the part when he and Kurosawa would not even speak to each other at the time as well as because Nikadai handles the part his own way. This is a dual role of course and the film opens with a very eerie looking shot of three men who look almost identical one being Yamazaki as the Lord's brother, and the other two being Nakadai as the war Lord and the thief Kagemusha who was spared so he could act as the Lord's double. Nakadai is actually quite brilliant right from the start as he plays the two characters compeltely differently even though they look exactly the same. As Shingen Nakadai has a pronounced confidence in his performance. There is a slyness in him and simply through his manner and self satisfied grin gives us a war lord whose cunning is pronounced.

Nikadai in a few scenes gives us a glimpse of the war lord Shingen and suggests so much more to him in so little time. He has that certain power of personality in his portrayal that shows exactly why the men would follow him as they do. Nikadai is very low key in his portrayal of this yet he establishes very effectively through a certain underlying wisdom in the man along with the blindness of a ruler. Nikadai shows what makes a man of power because he has what is there that allows him to gain and keep that power which is an intelligence and a conviction, but as well what the power will do to any man as there always is an indulgent pompousness that Nakadai brings in Shingen's healthy scenes suggesting that Shingen very much believes he is smarter than everyone around him.

What is outstanding about this performance is the way Nikadai can seem like a completely different man in the same scene despite looking exactly the same. In the first scene we also see Kagemusha who Nikadai is very different because he does not have any of the oppressive qualities that are in the other man, and is a far more despondent and emotional sort. His body language is different as Nikadai plays him as a far less controlled man who is more open in his fears as well as his emotions, and even is clearly less intelligent than Shingen as well. Nakadai also has a certain openness in Kagemusha that cannot be found in Shingen. Nikadai makes Kagemusha a very average man who finds himself struggling in a strange situation, but as Shingen he controls the situation. 

His role as Shingen and rather quickly but not without a send off scene for the lord which is very important. In his last scene he is gravely injured and soon will die but does not wish the cause of his clan to die along with him. The presumptive quality is gone and we see just what was always behind him which was a true passion for his cause. It is a very well handled scene because he does show there is something that was worthwhile in the man which is extremely important later on in the film in terms of Kagemusha's actions late in the film. Nakadai lets us see why the men would follow the man's wish through this passion as well as that same underlying power of personality that Nakadai gives to Shingen. After this point Nakadai exclusively plays Kagemusha and we get a very different performance from him.

Nakadai does not just change as the character he plays but even the type of performance he is going for as he is rather comic for quite awhile as Kagemusha first takes over for Shingen. The early scenes as he tries to grow accustom involve some brilliant comedic timing from Nakadai. This works particularly well because he has Kagemusha trying to be the big powerful commander even though he is not and there is a certain falseness to it all that works beautifully. He shows the effort that Kagemusha puts on to be Shingen as he always seems to be trying to be bigger than he is but never being completely believable as the man. There is one great moment in particular when the war lords grandson's questions Kagemusha's validity and Nakadai look of unease and worry is absolutely perfect.

Kagemusha though slowly starts to get the hang of the job and Nakadai has a great deal of fun showing the way Kagemusha starts to have a little bit of fun with the job as well. His portrayal of the ups and downs of the life as the performer are very well done by Nakadai. He always makes the impersonation something very complex though showing that this whole job affects Kagemusha in more than one fashion. There is the act of performance always there with the performance and he strikes the right chord of the man trying to do a good job of being another man who he looks just like without never quite being that man. It is a strange dynamic but one that Nakadai succeeds with incredibly well making Kagemusha's impersonation believable but never just repeating what he did earlier with Shingen.

There are changes in Kagemusha and Nakadai handles these each carefully and never rushes them in any respect. He shows the early mishaps with a great deal of humor but as well brings a very real fear of the whole idea of filling the shoes of the man. The fears is the only time I do have to quickly mention Mifune as these scenes almost seem like they were made for a classic Mifune freak out, as I said Nakadai is not Mifune but he commits himself admirably and still handles this his own way. He has that emotional intensity needed, it is not the same as it would have been from Mifune, but it does not have to be as part of what he does is that Kagemusha is almost petrified by the act of filling in for the dead man so Nakadai more downplayed approach works well in portraying the mental state of Kagemusha. 

Kagemusha though due to being in battle is forced to almost become Shingen suddenly. It is a difficult scene but one that Nakadai nails in treading the two characters. He does not become Shingen fully still. An inner power come out of Kagemusha and true passion for what the clan is doing but it is different from that shown by Shingen. Nakadai has this one from that of the passion of a normal man not a master of man, and there is something truly special about the moment because Nakadai brings out of Kagemusha's own soul that is entirely different from Shingen's. This event is short lived as the false Shingen is found out and Kagemusha is sent away.

The last scenes of the film are very impressive for Nakadai as he leaves Kagemusha as nothing left anymore and can only attempt to believe in Shingen's values. Nakadai despondent portrayal is quite moving as Kagemusha has become so invested in the cause he was technically only ever used by, but now has become such an integral part of. Losing his place so suddenly Nakadai shows Kagemusha to be shattered by the event leaving him as an emotional husk. It is handled perfectly by Nakadai because he absolutely has earned through his transformation that showed the investment of Kagemusha that made him the man, and this result could have only come from being instantly thrown out of even the slightest connection with the man. The very sad moment at the end of the film where Kagemusha last desperate attempt to do something for "his" clan is heartbreaking because Nakadai shows it as not the most sensible thing he could have done but the only thing Kagemusha had left to do. I have to admit that I love this performance by Tatsuya Nakadai and it even made me not mind at all that Toshiro Mifune did not lead this Kurosawa film. Nakadai never feels like a replacement here which is very important and he succeeds with this part in an incredible fashion. Technically speaking the Kagemusha could have been very simply just been very simple. Nakadai creates a complex portrait of both a charismatic warlord showing what makes a man of power, and of the impersonators journey which is one of humor, passion, and tragedy.
Read More
Posted in 1980 Alternate Best Actor, Tatsuya Nakadai | No comments

Friday, 14 June 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1980: Donald Sutherland in Ordinary People

Posted on 21:07 by pollard
Donald Sutherland did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe, for portraying Calvin Jarrett in Ordinary People.

Ordinary People won best picture as well as Best Supporting Actor for the clearly leading Timothy Hutton, and was also nominated for Best Actress for Mary Tyler Moore and it got yet another supporting actor nomination for Judd Hirsch as well. The only main player in the film unrecognized was the never nominated Donald Sutherland who was probably either knocked out by Robert Duvall's fine work in the Great Santini or Jack Lemmon's terribly overblown performance in Tribute. Sutherland though also may have missed because in terms of the type of acting noticed by the academy he gets the short end. Timothy Hutton gets the big emotional outbursts, Mary Tyler Moore gets to be the almost flamboyantly cold character, even Hirsch gets some fairly juicy lines in his scenes, but what does that leave poor Sutherland.

Well it actually leaves Sutherland as the heart of the film. After the death of one of the sons of the family it leaves the younger son Conrad (Hutton) suicidal and very much troubled, the mother Beth (Moore) who has only become colder and more distant to her son who was never her favorite as well tries to keep her social life just the same, Calvin the father though tries his best to deal with and keep his family together. Sutherland due to this has the most subtle work here in that much of his portrayal of Calvin's feelings are silent especially early on. Sutherland portrays Calvin as just trying to get on his life while still being clearly changed by the tragic event. We see him with his wife at various social events, and Sutherland shows him as man attempting to be there for his wife but his mind is always elsewhere.

Sutherland does two things really well here in that he shows that on one hand Calvin really just does not care much for the things they use to do, although that is all that his wife after seems to care about both through the boredom of his expression as well as his almost boyish enthusiasm when he suggest to his wife that they just defy expectations and do something else for a change. Sutherland is really good because it is not that Calvin is putting on any sort of facade, but rather he is trying but just can't feign enthusiasm for things that just are not on his mind. He as well does allow us to see what is on his mind which is not only the tragedy of the death of his son but the mental health of his living son. Whenever it comes to Conrad Sutherland only ever portrays such a genuine earnestness that establishes properly that Calvin desperately wants his son to get better.

Sutherland has Calvin put on a happy face again not as a facade even though it is not entirely true, but rather Sutherland presents it as Calvin trying to make things work. Sutherland has the right visible effort that he puts into Calvin as he tries to bring the three of them together as a happy family and his cheer is not false but Sutherland suggests is perhaps that Calvin is pushing it a little because he really wants to make the family come together after this awful experience. Of course Calvin himself is not over it, but he does indeed stay quiet about it at least for most of the film. The grief that Sutherland shows comes in a subtle but powerful fashion. It is not the overwhelming grief that Timothy Hutton portrays instead it is a withdrawn yet still palpable. A scene that always stays in my mind is a moment where Calvin thinks back when he stopped a fight between the boys and we see him thinking about it. Sutherland has such a simple expression yet one of man truly haunted by this tragedy.

Through most of the film Sutherland makes Calvin always the one just trying to make it work, and he is terrific in the way he portrays Calvin's methods of working with everyone. With his wife there is a distance but at times a really energy that Sutherland brings to the scenes like Calvin is trying just to get her warm up any way he can. With Conrad he is different but Sutherland once again shows Calvin trying to make it work as he portrays a genuine warmth with him. Sutherland always makes it clear that Calvin absolutely loves his son without exception and only wants the best. Sutherland even shares one scene with Judd Hirsch's psychiatrist Dr. Berger. It is a great scene as Sutherland brings that negotiator quality out of Calvin again as he tries his best to defend his wife's coldness as well as support his son as well. He also very effective allows an underlying uncertainty in this scene suggesting what becomes his path for the rest of his film which is questioning his wife's behavior. 

The late scenes of Sutherland's performance is finally when he breaks the mold of Calvin just trying to make it work and starts to confront his wife. Sutherland plays these scenes out brilliantly starting so modestly just asking her in a somber tone why even at her sons funerals she was concerned with unimportant things. This escalates to a much more open fight and again Sutherland is excellent because he absolutely earns the frustrations in the scene because it is something he has been building to quietly from the beginning of the film. Their fight ends though as Calvin once again confronts her although not about Conrad so much and rather their own relationship. Sutherland is outstanding because how he forcefully presses her about her refusal to deal with the family's emotions, but as well beautifully shows how dealing with this conversation which is ending his relationship with the woman he has been with for year is tearing him apart inside.

Sutherland's work here may not have been the chosen Oscar nominated work from this film but he should have been especially over Lemmon. Sutherland gives such a low key yet so very heartbreaking in his underplaying by just getting down to the barest of emotions in a man who is only trying his best to try to get over them and later face them. Calvin attempts to be the glue of the family and Sutherland is the glue that holds the film together acting as a balancing act between the emotional extremes found in Timothy Hutton's and Mary Tyler Moore's performances. He finds that middle ground without ever being forgotten among the fire and the ice that surrounds him. He creates a complex portrait of Calvin Jarrett and fills every scene he is in with an earnest devotion and a true poignancy.
Read More
Posted in 1980 Alternate Best Actor, Donald Sutherland | No comments

Thursday, 13 June 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1981: Bob Hoskins in The Long Good Friday

Posted on 18:35 by pollard
Bob Hoskins did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Bafta, for portraying Harold Shand in The Long Good Friday.

The Long Good Friday is a good film although I could not help but feel that if it just a little further with its concept it could have been a masterpiece.

The film starts with Bob Hoskins Harold Shand coming in from New York back to London rather excited for a big deal that will basically finalize his criminal empire in a legitimate fashion. Early on the criminal is not really all that suggested by Hoskins other than his less than refined manner, but for the most part he could easily be just a business man. Hoskins does this rather well as Harold Shand goes through trying to make the deal final with a big speech about bringing the greatness back to London. Hoskins is pretty good showing an earnest pride in the speech but at the same time playing up the fact that Harold is maybe forcing it a bit to really press the idea of the importance of the issue.

This all changes rather quickly though when bad things stop happening around him with several murders going on both successful and attempted involving both knives and bombs. Hoskins does something very important in his reactions from these early problems that befall Harold which is he shows that they deeply hurt Harold. One instance in particular as he grieves over the death of his friend is quite moving as Hoskins presents the connections all these violent acts had to Harold. This is not something that has just happened Hoskins shows that it does hurt Harold on a very personal level. It is not just the pain of grief he portrays but as well a great deal of confusion over the whole affair, which is something that will not going away for the rest of the film.

Harold does not stay nice for long as he quickly goes on a quest to find out who did these things and brutally return the favor. The early scenes of grief were essential though to make it so we can stick with Harold. He allows us to sympathize with him at first showing the human side to Harold nicely before we see the beast come out. The beast comes out though and Hoskins is incredible in the intensity that he brings to the part. He does not even need to say anything but just the way he stomps around suggests such violence in the man. Hoskins does not at all hold back in these scenes showing that even as Harold interrogates someone who may or may not be involved with murders he still issues their torture with a horrible sadism.

Hoskins realization of Harold as a character is something quite remarkable because as the monster of the man appears we see who this gangster clearly was. Importantly Hoskins does a certain type of sociopath here in Harold as he attempts his personal vengeance. The sociopathy aspect is controlled in a certain way not in a repressed way either. Hoskins makes it as something that goes right along with a great dominance as well. It is amazing to watch the way Hoskins dominates every scene he is in. Hoskins is excellent the way he seems ready to burst out any second yet still makes us believe that Harold is able to control and push around everyone around him in an attempt to damage control the situation at least early on.

One of the best aspects of this performance is the way he is able to maneuver through the constantly changing emotions in Harold as he goes throughout the series of events that only seem to get worst and worse for him. Hoskins is brilliant the way he will have the worst nature of the gangster slowly come out in one scene as he tries to get the bottom of it all in his feral anger that seems almost unending in the extremes he will get in his hatred that comes from his inability to understand why this is happening to him, but then in just a moments notice we seem like an understandable human being when someone snaps him out of it for at least a second. There is not a moment of disconnection Hoskins makes this all from the same man which is quite remarkable.

Something that is spectacular about this performance though is the way Hoskins seems like this man is as far as he can go in his grief, anger, and confusion near the beginning of the film, but some how Hoskins goes even further with all of these emotions even though he seems like he has already gone to the worst. As he seems to have no idea what to do he only becomes worse and Hoskins is at ten and somehow goes to eleven with his performance. The stress only make the hate in Harold to become worse, the confusion to overwhelm him all the greater, and even the scared little man inside of it all only becoming even more frightened by what this situation is doing to his life as well as what it is making him do.

When Harold finally learns what is behind it all he murders one of his closest men for merely telling him the facts of what going on. This one scene is almost the whole of his performance in a single scene as Hoskins shows a very honest fear in his confusion as he learns what is going on which soon becomes a harsh violence that is absolutely chilling because how sudden and almost how thoughtless Hoskins portrays the act. It is made only more striking though by the sorrow that Hoskins portrays as Harold comes to realize what he has done. We see him go from his least sympathetic to his most in just a few seconds and Hoskins absolutely achieves this almost impossible transition.

After thinking he finally can understand the situation in his terms Hoskins is great once again as Harold reverts back to the man in charge who quickly and efficiently goes about his plan to take down his enemies. Hoskins here perhaps suggests exactly how Harold got on top in the first place as he quickly and cunningly attacks the situation without hesitation. The results are not exactly as he wishes as he cannot save the deal from the beginning leaving one more speech from Harold to his would be investors. It is an interesting turn on his one from the start of the film now with a greater passion, but with far less hope and far more bitterness in the delivery showing how Harold's view has changed through his ordeal.

Of course the results are even worse then he thought as he has not won in any way as this enemy is different from those he has experienced from before. This leads to just a long take on Hoskins's face which is a terrific piece of silent acting as we see him start with only genuine surprise at what has happened, to anger filled with disbelief to finally settling at an acceptance that is just perfect because Hoskins finally shows us Harold without a single move to make. Hoskins performance all around a fascinating depiction of this rather peculiar English gangster. Like Edward Woodward in Breaker Morant Hoskins gives a very humane and memorable portrait of a man capable of terrible acts.
Read More
Posted in 1981 Alternate Best Actor, Bob Hoskins | No comments

Wednesday, 12 June 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1980: Edward Woodward and Jack Thompson in Breaker Morant

Posted on 19:28 by pollard
Edward Woodward did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying the titular Lt. Harry "Breaker" Morant.

Breaker Morant is an excellent film about three lieutenants court martialed for executing prisoners during the Boer war. 

Now I did put Jack Thompson as the only nominee but after the film I feel it is best to review both leads of the film as Woodward's performance should not be forgotten. Woodward as Morant gives often a withdrawn but interesting enough a very emotional performance. The reason for this is that he plays a soldier in the British army. Although he is a special unit mostly composed of Australians to deal with the Boer guerilla fighters he still is a British soldier and still therefore has the manner of a British soldier. it is always something to watch an actor give a powerful performance while still being in the restrictions of their character.

Woodward is terrific in creating Breaker Morant as a character and the history of the man even though that is something we only ever receive glimpses of it. Woodward throughout the film keeps Morant as the perfect soldier in his posture and overall manner. There are breaches of this at times but he is always very firm in being the soldier he would have to be to be the career soldier he is. Woodward is uncompromising in this depiction is something quite special because in his portrayal he shows an emotionally volatile nature in Morant even while he stays in structures of being the ideal British soldier.

We see the killing of the men that Morant ordered to killed in flash back. Woodward is outstanding in these scenes as we see the workings of this man and the way that he came to kill the men. What really drives Morant more than anything was that his friend was killed by the Boer in a brutal fashion and what he is doing is taking revenge out on them any way he could. Woodward is especially chilling because he conveys this violent intensity in these scenes well staying well put together for the most part. When he orders someone to do die he does not yell it, rather Woodward delivers it in a very simple yet harsh fashion as he stays cold on the surface even as he burns inside.

Woodward is brilliant in the way that he makes Morant still such a refined fellow who you would not think would be capable of such horrible actions. Woodward does have a certain charm, and more than that there is always an underlying humanity in his performance. Although he does act professional it is never that of a heartless professional in anyway. When he orders the killings it is not of a passionless man but instead a man whose passions in fact overwhelm him to do such things. Woodward mostly does this through his eyes which are so piercing in the way they portray the emotions in this man so fervently while the rest of his body tries hard to suppress them.

Woodward does not necessarily make you sympathize with the man, but he importantly does make you understand the man. Whenever he explains why he has done such things in the court or in a more private moment with one of the men we can see that where the atrocities came from are quite clear. On one hand there is that sense of duty which Woodward is masterful in depicting. That pride in being a soldier is always something that he brings to Morant with such tremendous affirmation, he shows the soldier who would follow such orders as well as even how the man could keep stay so calm, cool and even witty during his own execution.

In the same man though he does bring out the very human qualities. Whenever he speaking of the killing it is clear that the pain of his friends death is never something he can forget, Woodward makes it something he cannot even ignore. It is something on him at all times. That is not all though and Woodward never leaves him as just a man with a vendetta either. His pain is past that as in the court room scenes there is also a bitterness in him over the refusal of his higher ups to recognize the fact that what he did was part of the duty a duty that he served proudly. Woodward makes the betrayal known in a powerful way in which he both underplays but forcefully establishes these feelings when he admonishes the court.

There is a little more than just the soldier though in the briefest of moments when it is mentioned he was engaged to the sister of his friend who was killed. These are done with the utmost subtly but Woodward makes this moment quite beautiful in his subtle facial reactions. There is an incredible poignancy that Woodward brings to his performance in these moments suggesting there could have been so much more for Woodward if he had not been part of this war. One particularly great moment is when a sympathetic soldier suggests escape to him but he refuses saying "He has been everywhere". It is heartbreaking because Woodward suggests that really what Morant means is he has in actually no where to go as he has no purpose outside the army, and nothing left to go to.

This is a great performance by Edward Woodward due to the complexities that he brings to the part. There is never moment where he just makes Breaker Morant a typical man in any way. He makes him a charming poet with qualities like loyalty and bravery in him, but in the same man there lies hatred and the ability to do some very terrible things. There is never a disconnection and credit must be given to Woodward is that he never demands empathy or sympathy with his performance he lets Morant be Morant. Woodward puts him as a man and lets you judge him any way you wish. Woodward gives a fully realizes portrayal of Morant as  human being witt many good qualities but as well many flaws.
Jack Thompson did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning Cannes and an AFI award, for portraying Major J.F. Thomas in Breaker Morant.

Apparently the often repeated fact that Samuel L. Jackson won the only award ever for Best Supporting Actor in Cannes is no truer than that Columbus was trying to prove the world was round. Jack Thompson also won the limited Best Supporting Actor award at Cannes for his performance here although I would not put him in the supporting category. His role is technically much more limited and less complex than Edward Woodward's performance but he has the showiest role in the film receiving the most focus in the courtroom scenes as well has several scenes outside of the courtroom from his perspective.

The courtroom, as shown by films like Judgment at Nuremberg, The Verdict and Anatomy of a Murder, can often be a great showcase for acting. This is most certainly true in this film and most of this is brought by Thompson as the Australian Major who defends the three men and tries his best to help them even though the court very much wants to bring their conviction quickly to use them as scapegoats for all the atrocities committed during the war. Thomas though although is the man that the men choose he is not experienced in the military trial as well as not even as this sort of defense.

In the early trial scenes Thompson is rather good in showing Thomas work up to be able to defend them properly which Thompson does very well with his  hesitations and nervousness expressed along with an attempt at being properly in charge of the situation. Once Thomas feels confidant though he comes out as the sense of righteous indignation of the film. Thompson has the right style of cross examination showing exactly how Thomas will try to get to his point during the trial which is that the men were following the orders that brought the atrocities rather than the men just going off on their own.

Thompson brings out the point that Thomas is trying to make marvelously through his performance because there actually is not the type of sympathy one might expect from the good defense attorney. Thompson creates a unique balance in that he portrays a certain understanding for the man, but as well a frustration that is very much away from the men and rather a frustration with the authority above them. This distaste in Thompson is effectively portrayed by by Thompson because he really brings it with a force but never making it seem heavy handed either.

The indignation is present throughout but Thompson smartly keeps it underneath his words building to the point in which he comes out with it fully in his dramatic summation speech that tears into the established military for not viewing the atrocities as their own. The speech is a classic courtroom speech and Thompson delivers it with all of the conviction and passion that it deserves. He is unyielding in his resolve and Thompson brings the message that Thomas has been trying to get across the whole trail in remarkable fashion which is one of the best moments in this great film.

We don't learn a lot about Thomas in the film other than he is willing to fight for the men, and hates what is going on around him. Thompson even with his more limited role makes the most out of it through every one of scenes especially in the courtroom. He has that punch that all great performances of this kind due and he really tears into every scene leaving an impression. He is not only great in the courtroom but as well still creates complexities in his character particularly in the moral view held by Thomas as well as his interactions with the men. Thompson never leaves anything just black white in his performance, while still creating the moral high ground within the film.
Read More
Posted in 1980 Alternate Best Actor, Edward Woodward, Jack Thompson | No comments

Tuesday, 11 June 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1980

Posted on 16:31 by pollard
And the Nominees Were Not:

Anthony Hopkins in The Elephant Man

Edward Woodward in Breaker Morant


Donald Sutherland in Ordinary People

Tatsuya Nakadai in Kagemusha

Jack Thompson in Breaker Morant
Read More
Posted in 1980 Alternate Best Actor, Anthony Hopkins, Donald Sutherland, Edward Woodward, Jack Thompson, Tatsuya Nakadai | No comments

Monday, 10 June 2013

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1963: Results

Posted on 19:50 by pollard
5. Peter Sellers in The Pink Panther- Sellers is by far the best part of his film giving a hilarious turn that steals every scene he is in.

Best Scene: Clouseau takes the witness stand. 
4. Donald Pleasence in The Great Escape- Pleasence adds a lot in his little turn giving one poignant portrait of a man who wants to escape a prison escape even when his eye sight begins to fade.

Best Scene: Blythe thanks Hendley. 
3. Robert Shaw in From Russia With Love- Shaw is a great Bond villain. He is great as the silent menace, but he is something really special when he finally opens his mouth.

Best Scene: Colonel Nash reveals himself to be Red Grant. 
2. Brandon De Wilde in Hud- De Wilde is essential to his film being the man in the middle and creates a powerful reactionary performance by showing both how he deals with the men around him and as well how they change him.

Best Scene: Lon reacts to Hud and Homer's fight. 
1. Tsutomu Yamazaki in High and Low- My win for the supporting this year also goes to the great film High and Low. Yamazaki's performance as a kidnapper is one that only gets better the more I think about it. Despite the limitations for most of his film he creates a great complex villain, but as well in his last scene somehow manages to be heartbreaking in his portrayal of a desperate man.

Best Scene: King Gondo meets with Ginjirô Takeuchi.
Overall Rank:
  1. Tsutomu Yamazaki in High and Low
  2. Melvyn Douglas in Hud
  3. Brandon De Wilde in Hud
  4. Robert Shaw in From Russia With Love
  5. Donald Pleasence in The Great Escape
  6. Peter Sellers in The Pink Panther
  7. James Garner in The Great Escape
  8. Tatsuya Nakadai in High and Low 
  9. Claude Rains in Twilight Of Honor
  10. Kenjiro Ishiyama in High and Low
  11. Phil Silvers in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
  12. Walter Matthau in Charade
  13. Dick Shawn in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
  14. James Donald in The Great Escape
  15. Isao Kimura in High and Low
  16. Spencer Tracy in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
  17. Bobby Darin in Captain Newman M.D.
  18. Pedro Armendáriz in From Russia With Love
  19. Terry-Thomas in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
  20. Stanley Adams in Lilies of the Field
  21. Johnathan Winters in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
  22. Hugh Griffith in Tom Jones
  23. John Huston in The Cardinal 
  24. Nigel Green in Jason and the Argonauts 
  25. Roddy McDowall in Cleopatra
  26. Paul Lynde in Bye Bye Birdie
  27. Buddy Hackett in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World 
  28. Mickey Rooney in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
  29. Charles Bronson in The Great Escape
  30. John Leyton in The Great Escape
  31. James Coburn in Charade 
  32. Jesse Pearson in Bye Bye Birdie 
  33. Peter Falk in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World 
  34. Eddie Anderson in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World   
  35. David Warner in Tom Jones
  36. Tatsuya Mihasi in High and Low  
  37. Jim Backus in  It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World 
  38. Robert Duvall in Captain Newman M.D.
  39. Angus Lennie in The Great Escape
  40. Tony Curtis in Captain Newman M.D.
  41. Jimmy Durante in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World  
  42. Sid Caesar in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
  43. Gordon Jackson in The Great Escape
  44. George Kennedy in Charade
  45. Milton Berle in It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World 
  46. Ned Glass in Charade
  47. Nick Adams in Twilight of Honor
  48. Ossie Davis in The Cardinal
  49. Dan Frazer in Lilies of the Field
  50. Heinz Weiss in The Great Escape
  51. Peter Bull in Tom Jones
  52. Jacques Marin in Charade 
  53. George Devine in Tom Jones
  54. Ralph Nelson in Lilies of the Field
  55. James Coburn in The Great Escape
  56. Cecil Kellaway in The Cardinal
  57. Eddie Albert in Captain Newman, M.D.
  58. Bobby Rydell in Bye Bye Birdie
  59. Martin Landau Cleopatra
  60. Hume Cronyn in Cleopatra
  61. George Cole Cleopatra
  62. Robert Wagner in The Pink Panther
  63. Richard O'Sullivan in Cleopatra
Next Year: 1980 lead
Read More
Posted in 1963 Alternate Supporting, Brandon De Wilde, Donald Pleasence, Peter Sellers, Robert Shaw, Tsutomu Yamazaki | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • My Nominations
    For fun and for the record I have decided to list my nominations for every actor who receives at least nominations from me. I should clarify...
  • Alternate Best Actor 1943: Joseph Cotten in Shadow of a Doubt
    Joseph Cotten did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Charlie Oakley in Shadow of a Doubt. Shadow of a Doubt is an excellent thri...
  • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1994: Bob Gunton in The Shawshank Redemption
    Bob Gunton did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Warden Samuel Norton in The Shawshank Redemption. The Shawshank Redemption has...
  • Best Supporting Actor 2013: Jonah Hill in The Wolf of Wall Street
    Jonah Hill received his second Oscar nomination for portraying Donnie Azoff in The Wolf of Wall Street. Jonah Hill somehow has managed a se...
  • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1994: Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional
    Gary Oldman did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Norman Stansfield in Leon: The Professional. Leon: The Professional is an ent...
  • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1994: James Whitmore in The Shawshank Redemption
    James Whitmore did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Brooks Hatlen in The Shawshank Redemption. After having two large deliciou...
  • Alternate Best Actor 1987: John Lone in The Last Emperor
    John Lone did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe, for portraying Aisin-Gioro Puyi in The Last Emper...
  • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2013: Matthew McConaughey in The Wolf of Wall Street and Mud
    Matthew McConaughey did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Mark Hanna in The Wolf of Wall Street and the titular character of Mu...
  • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1970: Donald Sutherland in Kelly's Heroes
    Donald Sutherland did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Sergeant "Oddball" in Kelly's Heroes. Kelly's Heroes ...
  • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1970: Karl Malden in Patton
    Karl Malden did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying General Omar N. Bradley in Patton. Patton is a film almost wholly involved wi...

Categories

  • 1931 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1931 Alternate Supporting
  • 1934 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1934 Alternate Supporting
  • 1935 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1935 Best Supporting Actor
  • 1938 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1938 Alternate Supporting
  • 1942 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1942 Alternate Supporting
  • 1943 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1943 Alternate Supporting
  • 1944 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1944 Alternate Supporting
  • 1945 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1945 Alternate Supporting
  • 1948 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1948 Alternate Supporting
  • 1949 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1949 Alternate Supporting
  • 1950 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1950 Alternate Supporting
  • 1951 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1951 Alternate Supporting
  • 1952 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1952 Alternate Supporting
  • 1955 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1955 Alternate Supporting
  • 1958 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1958 Alternate Supporting
  • 1961 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1961 Alternate Supporting
  • 1963 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1963 Alternate Supporting
  • 1964 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1964 Alternate Supporting
  • 1966 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1966 Alternate Supporting
  • 1968 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1968 Alternate Supporting
  • 1969 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1970 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1970 Alternate Supporting
  • 1971 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1971 Alternate Supporting
  • 1973 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1975 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1975 Alternate Supporting
  • 1978 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1978 Alternate Supporting
  • 1979 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1979 Alternate Supporting
  • 1980 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1980 Alternate Supporting
  • 1981 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1981 Alternate Supporting
  • 1986 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1986 Alternate Supporting
  • 1987 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1987 Alternate Supporting
  • 1991 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1991 Alternate Supporting
  • 1992 Alternate Supporting
  • 1994 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1994 Alternate Supporting
  • 1995 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1996 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1996 Alternate Supporting
  • 1997 Alternate Best Actor
  • 1999 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2000 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2000 Alternate Supporting
  • 2001 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2001 Alternate Supporting
  • 2002 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2002 Alternate Supporting
  • 2006 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2009 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2009 Alternate Supporting
  • 2010 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2010 Alternate Supporting
  • 2013
  • 2013 Alternate Best Actor
  • 2013 Alternate Supporting
  • 2013 Best Supporting Actor
  • Adam Sandler
  • Al Pacino
  • Alan Ladd
  • Alastair Sim
  • Albert Finney
  • Alec Baldwin
  • Alec Guinness
  • Alejandro Jodorowsky
  • Andrew Garfield
  • Andy Robinson
  • Andy Serkis
  • Anthony Hopkins
  • Anthony Quinn
  • Arthur Kennedy
  • August Diehl
  • Barkhad Abdi
  • Barry Fitzgerald
  • Basil Rathbone
  • Bela Lugosi
  • Ben Cross
  • Ben Foster
  • Ben Mendelsohn
  • Bernard Hill
  • Best Actor
  • Bill Hunter
  • Billy Bob Thornton
  • Billy Crudup
  • Bob Gunton
  • Bob Hoskins
  • Bond
  • Boris Karloff
  • Brad Dourif
  • Brad Pitt
  • Bradley Cooper
  • Brandon De Wilde
  • Brian Cox
  • Bruce Dern
  • Bruce Willis
  • Bruno Ganz
  • Bryan Brown
  • Burl Ives
  • Burt Lancaster
  • Cary Grant
  • Charles Durning
  • Charles Laughton
  • Charlie Chaplin
  • Chiwetel Ejiofor
  • Choi Min-sik
  • Chow Yun-Fat
  • Chris Cooper
  • Christian Bale
  • Christian McKay
  • Christopher Lee
  • Christopher Reeve
  • Christopher Walken
  • Clark Gable
  • Claude Rains
  • Clint Eastwood
  • Colin Farrell
  • Cornel Wilde
  • Dan Duryea
  • Dana Andrews
  • Daniel Craig
  • Daniel Day-Lewis
  • David Hemmings
  • Dennis Hopper
  • Dennis Price
  • Dennis Quaid
  • Derek Jacobi
  • Dirk Bogarde
  • Donald O'Connor
  • Donald Pleasence
  • Donald Sutherland
  • Dustin Hoffman
  • Eddie Bracken
  • Edmond O'Brien
  • Edward Arnold
  • Edward G. Robinson
  • Edward Norton
  • Edward Woodward
  • Eli Wallach
  • Eric Bana
  • Erich Von Stroheim
  • Ernest Thesiger
  • Errol Flynn
  • Ewan McGregor
  • Farley Granger
  • Fernando Rey
  • Forest Whitaker
  • Frank Overton
  • Fred MacMurray
  • Fredric March
  • Gary Oldman
  • Gene Hackman
  • George C. Scott
  • George Clooney
  • George Lazenby
  • Gian Maria Volonte
  • Graham Chapman
  • Guy Pearce
  • Harrison Ford
  • Harry Dean Stanton
  • Henry Brandon
  • Henry Fonda
  • Humphrey Bogart
  • Ian Charleson
  • Ian Holm
  • Jack Albertson
  • Jack Nicholson
  • Jack Thompson
  • Jackie Earle Haley
  • Jake Gyllenhaal
  • James Cagney
  • James Dean
  • James Gandolfini
  • James Mason
  • James McAvoy
  • James Remar
  • James Stewart
  • James Whitmore
  • James Woods
  • Jared Leto
  • Jason Isaacs
  • Jason Robards
  • Jean Gabin
  • Jean Louis Trintignant
  • Jean-Louis Barrault
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • Jeffrey Dean Morgan
  • Jeremy Irons
  • Jim Carrey
  • Joaquin Phoenix
  • Joe Pantoliano
  • Joel McCrea
  • John Candy
  • John Cazale
  • John Goodman
  • John Hurt
  • John Lithgow
  • John Lone
  • John Savage
  • John Turturro
  • John Vernon
  • John Wayne
  • Johnny Depp
  • Jonah Hill
  • Joseph Cotten
  • Joseph Gordon-Levitt
  • Jude Law
  • Jurgen Prochnow
  • Karl Malden
  • Kenneth Branagh
  • Kirk Douglas
  • Klaus Kinski
  • Klaus Maria Brandauer
  • Laird Cregar
  • Lamberto Maggiorani
  • Laurence Fishburne
  • Laurence Olivier
  • Lee Van Cleef
  • Leon Vitali
  • Leonard Frey
  • Leonard Whiting
  • Leonardo Dicaprio
  • Leslie Howard
  • Leslie Nielsen
  • Lew Ayres
  • Liam Neeson
  • Lionel Barrymore
  • Louis Calhern
  • Mandy Patinkin
  • Marcello Mastroianni
  • Mark Hamill
  • Marlon Brando
  • Martin Sheen
  • Masayuki Mori
  • Matthew McConaughey
  • Max von Sydow
  • Mel Gibson
  • Mercel Herrand
  • Mervyn Johns
  • Michael Caine
  • Michael Denison
  • Michael Fassbender
  • Michael Hordern
  • Michael Palin
  • Michael Redgrave
  • Michael York
  • Mickey Rourke
  • My Nominations
  • Nicholas Tse
  • Nicolas Cage
  • Nigel Green
  • Nikolai Cherkasov
  • Noel Coward
  • Oliver Reed
  • Orson Welles
  • Oscar Isaac
  • Oskar Werner
  • Pat O'Brien
  • Paul Freeman
  • Paul McGann
  • Paul Muni
  • Pete Postlethwaite
  • Peter Boyle
  • Peter Capaldi
  • Peter Lorre
  • Peter O'Toole
  • Peter Sellers
  • Peter Ustinov
  • Philip Baker Hall
  • Pierce Brosnan
  • Pierre Fresnay
  • R. Lee Ermey
  • Ralph Fiennes
  • Ralph Richardson
  • Raul Julia
  • Ray Liotta
  • Ray Milland
  • Raymond Massey
  • Richard Attenborough
  • Richard Crenna
  • Richard Dawson
  • Richard Gere
  • Richard Harris
  • River Phoenix
  • Robert Carlyle
  • Robert De Niro
  • Robert Donat
  • Robert Duvall
  • Robert Mitchum
  • Robert Prosky
  • Robert Ryan
  • Robert Shaw
  • Robert Walker
  • Robin Williams
  • Roddy McDowall
  • Roger Livesey
  • Roger Moore
  • Roy Scheider
  • Russell Crowe
  • Ryan Gosling
  • Sam Rockwell
  • Sam Shepard
  • Samuel L. Jackson
  • Samuel West
  • Sean Bean
  • Sean Connery
  • Sharlto Copley
  • Sidney Poitier
  • Stanley Holloway
  • Sterling Hayden
  • Steve Buscemi
  • Steve Martin
  • Steve McQueen
  • Sydney Greenstreet
  • Takashi Shimura
  • Takeshi Kitano
  • Tatsuya Nakadai
  • Ted Levine
  • Tim Curry
  • Tim Holt
  • Tim Robbins
  • Timothy Dalton
  • Tobey Maguire
  • Tom Courtenay
  • Tom Hanks
  • Tom Hardy
  • Tony Leung Chiu Wai
  • Toshiro Mifune
  • Trevor Howard
  • Tsutomu Yamazaki
  • Val Kilmer
  • Victor McLaglen
  • Viggo Mortensen
  • Vincent D'Onofrio
  • W.C. Fields
  • Walter Brennan
  • Walter Huston
  • Walter Matthau
  • Wilford Brimley
  • William Bendix
  • William Demarest
  • William Hurt
  • William Powell
  • Zbigniew Cybulski
  • Zero Mostel

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2014 (154)
    • ▼  July (16)
      • Alternate Best Actor 1997: Russell Crowe and Guy P...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1997: Ian Holm in The Sweet H...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1997
      • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1942: Joseph Cotte...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1942: Results
      • Alternate Best Actor 1942: Tim Holt in The Magnifi...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1942: Pierre Fresnay in The M...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1942: Joel McCrea in The Palm...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1942: Noel Coward in In Which...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1942: Alan Ladd in This Gun F...
      • Alternate Best Actor 1942
      • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1979: Results
      • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1979: James Remar ...
      • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1979: Ian Holm in ...
      • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1979: Michael Pali...
      • Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1979: Dennis Hoppe...
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (28)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2013 (346)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (30)
    • ►  October (44)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (25)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (34)
    • ►  May (33)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (36)
    • ►  February (15)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

pollard
View my complete profile